A black smoky shadow appears in a dream of Ruth's one night, but, as one other unlucky lady once put it, "This is no dream, this is really happening!" She hears someone calling "Come home, Sammie" and thinks maybe a neighbor is looking for their cat. This event is set aside as MacDougal invites Ruth to his mother's home for a society soirée, the main event of which is, can you dig it, a séance. Ruth thinks it's a scam, this medium Madame Nada conjuring up long-dead folks from the Revolutionary War (still kind of a big deal in tony Washingtonian circles). What's funny in a modern problems way is that Ruth invites both Mac's mom and the medium to a dinner party in her own home! Motivated more by social duty than true warm-heartedness, this dinner party turns into one bizarre affair. No good deed, etc.
Meredith Press hardcover, 1968
After a discussion on the paranormal between Bruce (he accepts it), Mac (he doesn't), and Ruth (she's unsure), Mac parses Ruth well: "You are fastidious," he tells her. "You dislike the whole idea, not because it's irrational but because it's distasteful." Oh snap! The author will well note the strain supernatural occurrences put on daily living; it's difficult to keep up appearances when one's niece is suddenly a conduit to a crime committed in one's own house two hundred years earlier. Bruce endeavors in good faith to plumb the mystery, researching Ruth's home in town archives while Mac argues from the viewpoint of scientific rationality. Poor Sara, when not being possessed, kind of lounges about in a miniskirt, getting disapproving looks from her aunt and opposite ones from the Prof (ew!). Every now and again she'll pop in with a stray observation (it's not Sammie, it's Ammie!) but otherwise she's only a pawn in the possession game. Unspoiled, modern, guileless; she's around but not all there, I suppose, a vessel for the plot but not in and of herself; how could she have character if she is unsullied?
Experienced travelers in the realm of horror/supernatural/occult fictions will recognize familiar notes in the story. I find this rather comforting. I appreciated the author's efforts at detailing the banal everydayness that co-exists with the crazy: food, traffic, clothing, cleaning. The turbulent 1960s are noted here and there as Ruth is ambivalent about Bruce and his college-bred revolutionary airs and his designs on Sara. Ammie is also, as many of these pop novels are, charmingly dated: endless miniskirts, dudes with long hair, Ruth's old-lady attitudes (she's only in her 40s! She's never eaten pizza!), Bruce's hip-academic pretensions. Sometimes this aspect is less charming: gender normativity/misogyny out the wahoo in Prof's not-so-subtle lechery, and the time Bruce declares there are "women you rape and women you marry." Yee-ow.
Barbara Mertz (1927 - 2013)
aka Barbara Michaels, aka Elizabeth Peters
As the origins of the possession become clearer, our narrative becomes tauter: Bruce learns more about the home and its literal foundations ("the whole house is rotten with hate"). A friendly Father figure is enlisted to aid in an exorcism and this goes poorly. Then the old Prof isn't so above-it-all as he'd like to appear; is he part of what seems to be a historical reenactment from beyond? The back-story is satisfyingly unsettling; you'll agree it's a crime that deserves retribution through the ages. Ammie, Come Home ends on a note of sentiment, but it is only the beginning in a three-book series that Michaels continued into the 1990s. I found the novel to be decidedly okay and won't be reading the rest; go ahead and check it out if you think you'll dig a quaint snapshot of the supernatural '60s and a helluva generation gap.
Postscript: for two other takes on the novel, check out Dark Chateaux and The Midnight Room. And thanks for the pix guys!
I read some Barbara Michaels and liked 'em okay. I started with Be Buried In The Rain, because of the title. It turned out to be pretty good... nothing earth-shaking, but entertaining enough, even if it was kind of a romance novel with some spookiness thrown in (but, Dark Shadows is the same way, and I love me some Dark Shadows). It was good enough for me to pick up some more books of hers when I found them cheap at used bookstores. I think maybe I read another one or two of 'em, but even going back and looking at a list of titles I can't remember which ones, so, guess they weren't all that memorable. But, that means they weren't terrible, either, because if I hate a book, I'll remember it as much as one I loved.
So, yeah, she's an okay read. Kinda fluff, but there's nothing wrong with fluff once in a while.
This was made into a guilty pleasure TV movie just after its publication. It was a perfect fit for ABC programming, and I have a weak spot for it despite some its timid moments (though there is a great fight scene between Barbara Stanwyck and her possessed neice that has a kind of fierce style reminiscent of 28 Days Later!). Also always been curious on the step-back cover art for Michael's Shattered Silk. Check it out sometime. It's really morbid for something meant to attract the old lady crowd.
Ever Since I saw the tv movie I've been meaning to read this novel, but since then I've read several others by her, and they've all been sub-par. Even the gothics of that time were often better, but this novel is on my bucket list once I see the movie again. You can always watch the movie and compare the two. Gosh knows, her stuff was written to be made into television fodder.
Post a Comment