To me Saul is simply a hack whose publishers slotted him into the formulaic baby-in-peril/possession crap subgenres, with no relation to our actual beloved horror fiction tradition (market-based tradition, sure!). The Gothic romance novel, which had been so popular in the late '60s and early '70s, was on the wane as more modern and/or more graphic books and movies like Rosemary's Baby, Audrey Rose, and The Exorcist - and, yes, a little thing called Carrie - became enormously successful; looks like Saul's paperback originals sprang from these wells, amping up Gothic-y terrors while still appealing to a readership made up mostly of housewives and teenage babysitters. None of Saul's titles never even came close to appealing to me!
Saul always seemed to me more akin to a Mary Higgins Clark or V.C. Andrews than a Stephen King, and I always hated selling his shit to self-professed "horror" fans when I was working in bookstores while better books went unbought. And the nursery rhyme-style titles alone!
I've resisted featuring him on TMHF for all these reasons. Sure, it's prejudiced to bitch about Saul without having read him, but I'm speaking of my impressions based on years of working in bookstores and reading horror and understanding something about how publishers market their books, particularly during the paperback horror boom. Saul's books come across as mere product, not as authentic horror fiction.
But my archival impulse is strong, and the paperback cover art is so perfectly vintage, that in the interest of completion, I give you this John Saul paperback covers post, with his titles from 1977 to 1988 (his covers got a lot more boring after that). These are all first editions, first from Dell and then after he became successful, Bantam even published a couple in hardcover first. Nathaniel (1984) has my, uh, favorite cover art here.
Unloved cover by Lisa Falkenstern











